The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed open to arguments from the Trump administration that it has a right to turn asylum seekers away at border ports of entry, even if they have potentially valid claims and follow the legal process for pursuing them. Central to the case, Noem v. Al Otro Lado, is the question of whether someone who arrives at a port of entry along the southern U.S. border has the right to claim asylum, even if officials physically block them from actually entering the country. Much of the morning’s arguments hinged on the interpretation of the phrase “arrives...