A joke from one of NetChoice's attorneys scored a round of laughs from the Supreme Court justices during the social media hearing before the high court. The justices were heard laughing at an analogy used by Paul Clement, the lawyer representing tech group NetChoice, during Monday's oral arguments in a pair of cases that could fundamentally change the way social media companies operate—Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton. During the hearing, several of the justices were heard laughing when Clement posed a hypothetical where he wanted to create a Catholic website that wanted to keep off someone "who is...